Well pretty close says the source of all sources…Men’s Health :-) This month’s “MetroGrades” focussed on cities that were most giving during the holiday season — also noting the cities that were less magnanimous.
Madison took top spot as the most charitable holiday but Austin was right in the mix at #5 . Other notable Texas cities (on the higher end of the “charitable spectrum”) included Houston at #28, San Antonio at #31, and Lubbock rounded off the top half at #50 (“Highest” and “Lowest” Contribution cities with their MetroGrade included below)
How They Rated Each City & The “Online Factor”
- Online Contributions:
“To find the most giving cities, we first factored in who’s making the largest online charitable donations during the holidays (from Convio, a software provider for nonprofits).”
The more Tangible Metrics?
- Donations given to Goodwill in December
- Donations given to Salvation Army’s Red Kettle Campaign in December
- Number of toys donated to the Marine Toys for Tots Foundation.
How Do You “Define” Donation Nations’ “Cities”?…
The the “definition” of a city always seems to create comparison problems. Whatever the semantics, Los Angeles isn’t a city, it’s a Metropolis with a population of over 4 Million. How do you compare the “New Yorks” to the “Madisons”, & “Austins”…or even the “larger small cities” like Washington, DC or San Francisco?
Does anyone really care about the “city definition” in the context of this list? It doesn’t bother me. But when the mass media uses broad boundary generalizations to define real estate markets, it may very well create more compelling data, but it also surely sacrifices accuracy. It can be defined as nothing but irresponsible. And this is precisely why those of you interested in real estate information need to find a reputable local resource, like Eric’s here, and stay in the loop.
…Speaking of Real Estate & Thoughts?
You’ll see I’ve included the list of “Most Charitable” and “Least Charitable” cities according to MetroGrades. Given that small glimpse, I ask for your thoughts?.
- Thoughts on how the real estate market may have effected this list? Any patterns?
- Thoughts about better ways to summarize data without over-generalizing?
- Anything else you’d like to contribute is always welcome, too…
MetroGrades Rankings
“Most Charitable”
1. Madison, WI (A+)
2. Richmond, VA (A)
3. Seattle, WA (A)
4. Cincinnati, OH (A)
5. Austin, TX (A-)
6. Spokane, WA (A-)
7. Columbia, SC (A-)
8. Pittsburg, PA (A-)
9. Tampa, FL (A-)
10. Norfolk, VA (A-)
11. Charlotte, NC (B+)
12. Salt Lake City (B+)
13 Omaha, NE (B+)
14. Cheyenne, WY (B+)
15. Willmington, DE (B+)
16. Portland, OR (B+)
17. Atlanta, GA (B+)
18. St Louis, MO (B+)
19. Birmingham, AL (B+)
20. Burlington, VT (B)
“Less Charitable”
80. Corpus Christi, TX (D)
81. Fremont, CA (D)
82. Phladelphia, CA (D)
83. Buffalo, NY (D)
84. Baltimore, MD (D)
85 Poenix AZ (D)
86. Anaheim, CA (D-)
87. Cleveland, OH (D-)
88. Kansas City, MO (D-)
89. Little Rock, AR (D-)
90. Jersey City, NJ (F)
91. Jackson, MS (F)
92. Columbus, OH (F)
93. Riverside, CA (F)
94, Oklahoma City, OK (F)
95, Los Angeles, CA (F)
96, New York, NY (F)
97. Fresno, CA (F)
98. Nework, NJ (F)
99. El Paso, TX (F)
100. Yonkers, NY (F)
Licensed in Virginia, Maryland, and D.C., Kevin Koitz, with The Koitz Group @ Long and Foster RE specializes in high end Washington DC real estate and surrounding luxury communities in Montgomery County Maryland & Northern Virginia. Visit his Bethesda Real Estate blog or his Chevy Chase Real Estate guide to get a flavor for some of finest communities in the DC Metropolitan Area.





Kevin, Thanks for mentioning the Convio rankings of the most generous online cities which played a role in the Men’s Health rankings. We ranked 273 cities (with total population of more than 100,000) based on actual per capita online giving and more than 1,700 cities of less than 100,000 people based on the amount donated online. The rankings are based on the more than $777 million in online donations processed by Convio on behalf of thousands of the nation’s leading nonprofit organizations during the calendar year. The data reflects the city of the donor not an IP address. Austin keeps moving up our list as well – 13th in 2008, currently 7th in 2009. We’ll see where Austin ends up when we release the final data early next year. With the economy and many fine charities in Austin, let’s hope we move way up the list.
Sounds like a fascinating study. Congrats to Austin with a solid showing
Hi Tad….many thanks for the clarification. Very cool…I was just trying to conceptualize how online “participation” is measured on such a large scale. How do you partition non-profits who have multiple headquarters out of curiosity? Thanks again for checking in…
Our software and services are delivered via a multi-tenent SaaS platform. Our MultiCenter option allows affiliate-type organizations with multiple HQs/affiliates/chapters to offer an ever-changing set of decentralized programs while using a centralized data repository. In many cases the multiple headquarters of the same umbrella organization are individual entities with their own systems and programs. Either way we can meet their needs.
Way to go Austin!!! We should all do our part as much as possible.
My son is trying to start a non profit org. To take kids out fishing on the weekends. I think it would be great if he could get it going.